Algebraic Thinking in Problem-Solving: A Bibliometric Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38114/riemann.v7i3.132Keywords:
Algebraic Thinking, Problem-Solving, Bibliometric AnalysisAbstract
Generalization and symbolic manipulation are fundamental components of algebraic thinking. Generalization is often regarded as the core of mathematics and a defining characteristic of problem solving. Consequently, the use of problem-solving contexts has strong potential to enhance and develop individuals’ algebraic thinking skills. Both algebraic thinking and problem solving play a crucial role in determining success in solving mathematical problems. To examine research trends in these areas, a bibliometric analysis was employed within a systematic mapping study by reviewing documents indexed in the Scopus database. The results indicate that between 2001 and 2021, only 35 Scopus-indexed articles explicitly addressed algebraic thinking and problem solving. This study aims to fill gaps in the state of the art by conducting a bibliometric review of these 35 articles. The findings reveal that algebraic thinking and problem solving remain prominent and relevant research topics in mathematics education. However, word cloud analysis shows that the term belief appears in relatively small proportions, while self-efficacy has not yet emerged within the thematic networks or research trends related to algebraic thinking and problem solving. Moreover, studies integrating algebraic thinking, problem solving, scaffolding, and self-efficacy are still limited. Research focusing on student participants and mathematical content within the maritime domain is also scarce. Therefore, a promising direction for future research is to explore algebraic thinking processes through problem-solving scaffolding based on levels of self-efficacy among maritime students.
Downloads
References
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017a). A brief introduction to bibliometrix. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017b). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
Blanton, M., & Kaput, J. (2005). Characterizing a classroom practice that promotes algebraic reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 412–446
Carpenter, T. P., & Levi, L. (2000). Developing conceptions of algebraic reasoning in the primary grades. Research Report. In Research Report: National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED470471
Carraher, D. W., Schliemann, A. D. & Brizuela, B. M. (2003). Bringing out the algebraic character of arithmetic: From children’s ideas to classroom practice [Electronic version]. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved 5 May 2009, from http://www.earlyalgebra.terc.edu/publications.htm
Chadegani, A. A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M. M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ebrahim, N. A. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5): 18– 26
Chen, G., & Xiao, L. (2016). Selecting publication keywords for domain analysis in bibliometrics: A comparison of three methods. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 212-223.
Chimoni, M., Pitta-Pantazi, D., & Christou, C. (2018). Examining early algebraic thinking: Insights from empirical data. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 98(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018- 9803-x
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382-1402.
Driscoll, M. (1999). Fostering Algebraic Thinking: A Guide for Teachers, Grades 6-10. Heinemann, 361 Hanover Street, Portsmouth, NH 03801-3912.
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2): 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF.
Gupta, B. M., & Bhattacharya, S. (2004). Bibliometric approach towards mapping the dynamics of science and technology. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 24(1): 3–8
Herbert, K., & Brown, R. H. (1997). Patterns as tools. Teaching Children Mathematics, 3(1997), 340-345. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.3.6.0340
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scafolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.
Kamol, N., & Har, Y. B. (2010). Upper primary school students’ algebraic thinking. In L. Sparrow, B. Kissane, & C. Kurst (Eds.), Shaping the future of mathematics education: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 289-296). MERGA.
Kaput, J. J. (1998). Transforming algebra from an engine of inequity to an engine of mathematical power by ‘‘algebrafying’’ the K-12 curriculum. In S. Fennel (Ed.), The nature and role of algebra in the K-14 curriculum: Proceedings of the national symposium (pp. 25–26). Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy Press.
Kaput, J. J. (2002). Research on the development of algebraic reasoning in the context of elementary mathematics: A brief historical overview. In D. S. Mewborn, P. Sztajn, D. Y. White, H. G. Wiegel, R. L. Bryant, & K. Nooney (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual meeting of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 120–122). Columbus, OH: ERI
Kaput, J. J. (2008). What is algebra? What is algebraic reasoning? In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), ALGEBRA in the early grades. Taylor & Francis Group
Kaput, J. J., Blanton, M. J. & Moreno, L. (2008). Algebra from a symbolization point of view. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 19-55). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Kieran, C. (1996). The changing face of school algebra. In C. Alsina, J. Alvarez, B. Hodgson, C. Laborde, & A. Pérez (Eds.), 8th international congress on mathematical education: Selected lectures (pp. 271–290). Seville, Spain: S. A. E. M. Thales
Kieran, C. (2004). Algebraic thinking in the early grades: What is it. The mathematics educator, 8(1), 139-151.
Kim, M. C., & Hannafn, M. J. (2011). Scafolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. Computers & Education, 56(2), 403–417.
Kriegler, S. (2007). Just what is algebraic thinking? Introduction to Algebra :TeacherHandbook, 1-11.
Mason, J. (2008). Making use of children’s powers to produce algebraic thinking. Algebra In The Early Grades, 2008, 57-94. https://doi.org/10.4324/ 9781315097435-4
Moses, B. (1995). Algebra, the new civil right. In C. Lacampagne, W. Blair, & J. Kaput (Eds.), The algebra colloquium (Vol. 2, pp. 53–67). Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standarts for school mathematics. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scafolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423–451. https://doi. org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_6
Pitta-Pantazi, D., Chimoni, M., & Christou, C. (2020). Different types of algebraic thinking: an empirical study focusing on middle school students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(5), 965-984.
Radford, L. (2000). Signs and meanings in students’ emergent algebraic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42(3), 237-268. https://doi.org/ 10.1023/A:1017530828058
Radford, L., & Sabena, C. (2015). The question of method in a Vygotskian semiotic approach. In Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education (Issue January 2014, (pp. 157-182). https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_7
Radford, L. (2000). Sings and meanings in students’ emergent algebraic thinking: A semiotic analysis. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42(3), 237–268. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017530828058.
Radford, L., & Puig, L. (2007). Syntax and meaning as sensuous, visual, historical forms of algebraic thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(2), 145-164.
Radford, L. (2013). The progressive development of early embodied algebraic thinking. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(2), 257–277
Ralston, N. C. (2013). The development and validation of a diagnostic assessment of algebraic thinking skills for students in the elementary grades [PhD Dissertation, University of Washington]
Schliemann, A. D., Carraher, D. W., & Brizuela, B. M. (2013). Bringing out the algebraic character of arithmetic: From children’s ideas to classroom practice. Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/ 10.4324/9780203827192Stephens, A., Blanton, M., Knuth, E., Isler, I., & Gardiner, A. M. (2015). Just say yes to early algebra! Teaching Children Mathematics, 22(2), 92. https://doi.org/ 10.5951/teacchilmath.22.2.0092
Schmidt, H. G., Loyens, S. M., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2007). Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: Commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 91–97.
Secinaro, S., Brescia, V., Calandra, D., & Biancone, P. (2020). Employing bibliometric analysis to identify suitable business models for electric cars. Journal of Cleaner Production, 121503
Sibgatullin, I. R., Korzhuev, A. V., Khairullina, E. R., Sadykova, A. R., Baturina, R. V., & Chauzova, V. (2022). A Systematic Review on Algebraic Thinking in Education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1).
Stephens, A., Blanton, M., Knuth, E., Isler, I., & Gardiner, A. M. (2015). Just say yes to early algebra! Teaching Children Mathematics, 22(2), 92. https://doi.org/ 10.5951/teacchilmath.22.2.0092Sutherland, R., Rojano, T., Bell, A., & Lins, R. (Eds.). (2001). Perspectives on school algebra. Springer Science & Business Media.
Swafford, J.O. and Langrall, C.W.: 2000, ‘Grade 6 students’ preinstructional use of equations to describe and represent problem situations’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 89–112
Tillema, E. S., & Burch, L. J. (2022). Using combinatorics problems to support secondary teachers understanding of algebraic structure. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 1-17.Denyer, D. & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222.
Tobias, S., & Dufy, T. M. (Eds.). (2009). Constructivist instruction: Success or failure?. Routledge.
Usiskin, Z. (1999). Conceptions of school algebra and uses of variables. In B. Moses (Ed.), The ideas of algebra, K-12 (Issue 5, pp. 8-19).
Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., Dekker, R., & van den Berg, J. (2010). A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12): 2405– 2416. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21421
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. . Harvard University Press.
Windsor, W. (2010). Algebraic Thinking: A Problem Solving Approach. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Luthfiana Tarida, Dedeh Suryani (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
