Can STEM Learning Supported by Dynamic Mathematics Software (DMS) Enhance Students’ Complex Problem Solving in Climate Change?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38114/riemann.v8i1.156Keywords:
Climate Change, Complex Problem Solving, Dynamic Mathematics Software (DMS), Problem-Based Learning, STEM EducationAbstract
The development of students’ Complex Problem Solving (CPS) skills remains constrained by mathematics instruction that is primarily procedural and insufficiently connected to real-world global issues, particularly climate change. To address this limitation, the present study investigates whether STEM learning supported by Dynamic Mathematics Software (DMS) can improve senior high school students’ CPS abilities within climate change contexts. A quasi-experimental, non-equivalent pretest–posttest control group design was implemented with 69 eleventh-grade students. The experimental group participated in STEM learning integrated with DMS, while the control group received direct instruction on the same climate change context. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, paired-sample t-tests, N-Gain, and Cohen’s D. Results showed that the experimental group achieved a high N-gain score (0.79), whereas the control group attained a low gain (0.29). The magnitude of this increase is also reflected in the effect size Cohen's d values, 5.893 in the experimental class and 2.438 in the control class. These findings suggest that STEM learning supported by Dynamic Mathematics Software constitutes an effective pedagogical strategy for advancing students’ complex problem-solving skills and strengthening mathematics education
Downloads
References
Abaajeh, A. R., Kingston, C. E., & Harty, M. (2023). Environmental factors influencing the growth and pathogenicity of microgreens bound for the market: a review. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 38, e12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174217052300008X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S174217052300008X
Abdurrahman, A., Maulina, H., Nurulsari, N., Sukamto, I., Umam, A. N., & Mulyana, K. M. (2023). Impacts of integrating engineering design process into STEM makerspace on renewable energy unit to foster students’ system thinking skills. Heliyon, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15100
Adelabu, F. M., Makgato, M., & Ramaligela, S. M. (2022). Improving students’ understanding of geometry concepts through dynamic geometry computer software. In Innovations In Online Teaching And Learning: Case studies of teacher educators from South Africa during the COVID-19 era (pp. 175–189). https://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2022.BK376.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2022.BK376.10
AlAli, R. (2024). Enhancing 21st century skills through integrated stem education using project-oriented problem-based learning. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites , 53(2), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.53205-1217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.53205-1217
Arends, R. (2012). Learning to Teach. McGraw-Hill. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=B1trewAACAAJ
Arifin, S., Setyosari, P., Sa’dijah, C., & Kuswandi, D. (2020). The effect of problem-based learning by cognitive style on critical thinking skills and students’ retention. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 10(2), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.3926/JOTSE.790 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.790
Arikunto, S. (2021). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik (Cetakan ke-1). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. K. (2009). Introduction to Research in Education. Cengage Learning.
Barańska, D., Panek, J., Różalska, S., Turnau, K., & Frąc, M. (2025). Microgreens as the future of urban horticulture and superfoods, supported by post-harvest innovations for shelf-life increase: a review. Scientia Horticulturae, 350, 114303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2025.114303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2025.114303
Barwell, R., & Hauge, K. (2021). A critical mathematics education for climate change: a post-normal approach (pp. 166–184). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004465800_008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004465800_008
Batchelder, M., Swinney, M., O’Hara, T., Goddard, A., Lewis, E., Cox, J., & Fowler, H. J. (2023). Experiences from a school–university partnership climate and sustainability education project in england: the value of citizen science and practical stem approaches. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129401
Bates, R., Brenner, B., Schmid, E., Steiner, G., & Vogel, S. (2022). Towards meta–competences in higher education for tackling complex real–world problems – a cross disciplinary review. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(8), 290–308. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2021-0243 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2021-0243
Boehm, S., Jeffery, L., Hecke, J., Schumer, C., Jaeger, J., Fyson, C., Levin, K., Nilsson, A., Naimoli, S., Daly, E., Thwaites, J., Lebling, K., Waite, R., Collis, J., Sims, M., Singh, N., Grier, E., Lamb, W., Castellanos, S., … Masterson, M. (2023). State of Climate Action 2023. In World Resources Institute. https://doi.org/10.46830/wrirpt.23.00010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46830/wrirpt.23.00010
Budiyono. (2015). Pengantar penilaian hasil belajar. UPT Penerbitan dan Percetakan UNS (UNS Press).
Chechan, B., Ampadu, E., & Pears, A. (2025). Student strategies for digital tool use in mathematical problem solving. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2025.2457361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2025.2457361
Chen, F., Liu, Y., Gao, Y., Cui, Y., Wang, Q., & Lu, C. (2025). Does ICT matter for complex problem-solving competency? A multilevel analysis of 33 countries and economies. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 57(2023), 101805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101805 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101805
Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 88–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.001
Climate risk country profile. (2021). World Bank, Washington, DC and Asian Development Bank, Manila. https://doi.org/10.1596/36382
Coletta, V. P., & Steinert, J. J. (2020). Why normalized gain should continue to be used in analyzing preinstruction and postinstruction scores on concept inventories. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010108
Cross, I. D., & Congreve, A. (2021). Teaching (super) wicked problems: authentic learning about climate change. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 45(4), 491–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2020.1849066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2020.1849066
Dorimana, A., Uworwabayeho, A., & Nizeyimana, G. (2022). Enhancing upper secondary learners’ problem-solving abilities using problem-based learning in mathematics. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(8), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.8.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.8.14
El Bilali, H., Henri Nestor Bassole, I., Dambo, L., & Berjan, S. (2020). Climate change and food security. The Journal “Agriculture and Forestry,” 66(3). https://doi.org/10.17707/AgricultForest.66.3.16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17707/AgricultForest.66.3.16
Fajrina, S., Lufri, L., & Ahda, Y. (2020). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (stem) as a learning approach to improve 21st century skills: a review. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (IJOE), 16(07), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v16i07.14101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v16i07.14101
Fissore, C., Marchisio, M., Roman, F., & Sacchet, M. (2021). Development of problem solving skills with maple in higher education. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1414, 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81698-8_15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81698-8_15
Fitriani, N. (2021). Analisis tingkat kesukaran, daya pembeda, dan efektivitas pengecoh soal pelatihan kewaspadaan kegawatdaruratan maternal dan neonatal. Paedagoria : Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kependidikan, 12, 199. https://doi.org/10.31764/paedagoria.v12i2.4956 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/paedagoria.v12i2.4956
Funke, J. (2010). Complex problem solving: a case for complex cognition? Cognitive Processing, 11(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-009-0345-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-009-0345-0
González, A. M. C., Ramírez, V. R., Pérez, M. E. Q., Mojica, I. P. R., Vargas, J. E. C., Cotto, A. A. P., & Rivera, E. I. O. (2024). Implementing problem-based and experiential learning for undergraduate students in power electronics applied to renewable energy. 2024 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE61694.2024.10892952 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE61694.2024.10892952
Gülburnu, M. (2025). The role of dynamic geometry software and the route of teacher–student interactions. Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2025.2540898 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2025.2540898
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Hauge, K. H., Gøtze, P., Hansen, R., & Steffensen, L. (2021). Potential for critical reflections on climate change figures. In Lived Democracy in Education (pp. 77–89). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003088233-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003088233-8
He, A., Yuan, W., & Kiliçman, A. (2025). A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of Dynamic mathematics Software on K-12 students’ mathematics learning. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 56(9), 1832–1855. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2024.2375257 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2024.2375257
Hermawan, C. M., Rosfiani, O., & Lutfiana, V. (2020). The effectiveness of direct instruction model in mathematics subjects: A classroom action research in elementary school. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(4), 2506–2509. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85084412038&partnerID=40&md5=fa7ea6a2b6eec14aefe16d6a82d66c51
Hohenwarter, M., & Fuchs, K. (2004). Combination of dynamic geometry, algebra and calculus in the software system GeoGebra.
Ji, Z., Guo, K., & Song, S. (2024). Effects of dynamic mathematical software on students’ performance: a three-level meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(4), 1035–1060. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241226594 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241226594
Johnson, C. C., Walton, J. B., & Peters-Burton, E. (2023). Creating global bonds, grade 12: stem road map for high school. In Creating Global Bonds, Grade 12: STEM Road Map for High School. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003362371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003362371
Juandi, D., Kusumah, Y. S., Tamur, M., Perbowo, K. S., Siagian, M. D., Sulastri, R., & Negara, H. R. P. (2021). The effectiveness of dynamic geometry software applications in learning mathematics: a meta-analysis study. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(2), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i02.18853 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i02.18853
Kainikkara, F. S., Shams, R., Dash, K. K., & Béla, K. (2025). Development strategies and processing effects on the nutritional and bioactive composition of microgreens: A comprehensive review. Applied Food Research, 5(2), 101280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2025.101280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2025.101280
Kondratenko, E. P., Vityaz, S. N., Miroshina, T. A., & Kuznetsov, A. S. (2022). Microgreens - biologically complete product of the XXI century. BIO Web of Conferences, 42, 01002. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20224201002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20224201002
Kramarenko, T. H., Pylypenko, O. S., & Zaselskiy, V. I. (2020). Prospects of using the augmented reality application in STEM-based Mathematics teaching. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2547, 130–144. https://doi.org/10.31812/educdim.v53i1.3843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31812/123456789/3753
Kravitz, M. B., Dadario, N. B., Arif, A., Bellido, S., Arif, A., Ahmed, O., Gibber, M., Jafri, F. N., & Jafri, F. (2022). The comparative effectiveness of virtual reality versus e-module on the training of donning and doffing personal protective equipment: a randomized, simulation-based educational study. Cureus, 14(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23655
Kurniawan, L., Dwandaru, W. S. B., Kuswanto, H., & Pamungkas, O. (2026). Effectiveness of E-Book thermodynamics based on STEM discovery learning assisted with virtual laboratory simulation to improve high school students’ critical thinking. Revista Mexicana de Física E, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.31349/RevMexFisE.23.010205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31349/RevMexFisE.23.010205
Lan, X., Zhou, Y., Wijaya, T. T., Wu, X., & Purnama, A. (2021). The effect of dynamic mathematics software on mathematical problem solving ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1), 012059. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012059
Latifi, M., Eseghir, A., Elmaroufi, A., Hattaf, K., & Achtaich, N. (2022). Modeling with differential equations and geogebra in high school mathematics education. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 12(3), 47–91. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2022-0065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2022-0065
Lusiana, I., Susongko, P., & Nafiati, D. (2024). Desain instrumen tes capaian pembelajaran matematika dengan uji validitas pearson correlation. Journal of Education Research, 5, 5666–5675. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i4.1700 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i4.1700
Malau, L. R. E., Darhyati, A. T., & Suharno. (2021). The impact of climate change and natural disasters on food security in Indonesia: lessons learned on preserving forests sustainability. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 886(1), 012090. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/886/1/012090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/886/1/012090
Masjudin. (2024). Strengthening 21st century skills through an independent curriculum in mathematics education in indonesia: challenges, potential, and strategies. International Journal of Applied Science and Sustainable Development (IJASSD), 6(2), 92–113. https://doi.org/10.36733/ijassd.v6i2.9087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36733/ijassd.v6i2.9087
Masterson, V. (2022). Want to boost your creativity? switch off your smartphone and let your mind wander, say scientists. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2022/08/free-thinking-boosts-creativity/
Md-Ali, R., & Kim, K. (2018). Geogebra in learning of mathematics towards supporting “stem” education. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 776–782. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.spi6.776.782 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.spi6.776.782
Mierluş-Mazilu, I., & Yilmaz, F. (2024). Teaching mathematics in stem education. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, 439, 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49218-1_11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49218-1_11
Molnár, G., Alrababah, S. A., & Greiff, S. (2022). How we explore, interpret, and solve complex problems: A cross-national study of problem-solving processes. Heliyon, 8(1), e08775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08775 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08775
Nandiyanto, A. B. D., & Hofifah, S. N. (2024). How to conduct paired-t-test SPSS: comprehension in adsorption with bibliometric. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(1), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i1.27541 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i1.27541
Narsareddygari, S., & Naik, S. M. (2025). Bridging the Skills Gap: Innovative Teaching Methods for Enhancing Engineering Education (pp. 190–200). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-99025-0_15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-99025-0_15
Nicolay, B., Krieger, F., Kuhn, J.-T., Graesser, A. C., Ifenthaler, D., Baker, R., & Greiff, S. (2023). Unsuccessful and successful complex problem solvers – A log file analysis of complex problem solving strategies across multiple tasks. Intelligence, 101, 101793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2023.101793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2023.101793
Nicolay, B., Krieger, F., Stadler, M., Gobert, J., & Greiff, S. (2021). Lost in transition – Learning analytics on the transfer from knowledge acquisition to knowledge application in complex problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106594 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106594
Pamungkas, M. D., Rahmawati, F., Kusuma, J. W., Kontoko, K., & Purnomo, E. A. (2024). Optimizing mathematics teacher candidates’ complex problem-solving skills: a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness of the problem-based learning model. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v14i2.28014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v14i2.28014
Pamungkas, M. D., Waluya, S. B., Mariani, S., & Isnarto. (2023). A systematic review of complex problem-solving in education and mathematics education. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(16). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i16.6465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i16.6465
Park, Y. (2025). Optimal two-stage group sequential designs based on Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. PLoS ONE, 20(2 February). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318211
Phoodee, W., Diego-Mantecon, J. M., Lavicza, Z., & Houghton, T. (2024). Using dynamic software for developing thai students’ analytical thinking skills in mathematics. Southeast Asian Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 9.
Rahmstorf, S., & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2018). Der Klimawandel: Diagnose, Prognose, Therapie. C.H.Beck. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406726736
Rathi, S., & Nirgude, V. (2021). Fostering progressive experiential learning approach to make engineering students future ready. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 35(S3), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2022/v35is3/22146 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2022/v35is3/22146
Retnawati, H. (2016). Proving content validity of self-regulated learning scale (The Proving content validity of self-regulated learning scale (The comparison of Aiken index and expanded Gregory index) comparison of Aiken index and expanded Gregory index). REID (Research and Evaluation in Education) REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 2(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i2.11029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i2.11029
Rizki, I. A., & Suprapto, N. (2024). Project-oriented problem-based learning through sr-stem to foster students’ critical thinking skills in renewable energy material. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33(4), 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10102-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10102-2
Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). New effect size rules of thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(2), 597–599. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100
Seth, T., Mishra, G. P., Chattopadhyay, A., Deb Roy, P., Devi, M., Sahu, A., Sarangi, S. K., Mhatre, C. S., Lyngdoh, Y. A., Chandra, V., Dikshit, H. K., & Nair, R. M. (2025). Microgreens: functional food for nutrition and dietary diversification. Plants, 14(4), 526. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14040526 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14040526
Shirvell, B. (2023). Climate change in the indonesian mind. Yale School Of The Environtment, 6.
Siller, H. S., Vorhölter, K., & Just, J. (2024). Problem posing as a way of promoting individual mathematical thinking in stem contexts – the case of climate change. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, (0123456789). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10518-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10518-7
Smith, K., Maynard, N., Berry, A., Stephenson, T., Spiteri, T., Corrigan, D., Mansfield, J., Ellerton, P., & Smith, T. (2022). Principles of problem-based learning (pbl) in stem education: using expert wisdom and research to frame educational practice. Education Sciences, 12(10), 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100728 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100728
Sundayana, H. R. (2019). Statistika penelitian pendidikan.
Suparman, Juandi, D., & Tamur, M. (2021). Review of problem-based learning trends in 2010-2020: A meta-analysis study of the effect of problem-based learning in enhancing mathematical problem-solving skills of Indonesian students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1722(1), 012103. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1722/1/012103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1722/1/012103
Szilágyi, S., Körei, A., & Vaičiulyté, I. (2024). An innovative steam-based method for teaching cycloidal curves in engineering higher education. Education Sciences, 14(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101087
The World Bank Group & Asian Development Bank. (2021). Climate risk country profile. In Climate Risk Country Profile. World Bank, Washington, DC and Asian Development Bank, Manila. https://doi.org/10.1596/36382 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/36382
Thukral, S., Kovac, S., & Paturu, M. (2023). t-test. In Translational Interventional Radiology (pp. 139–143). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823026-8.00104-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823026-8.00104-8
Ulia, N., Waluya, S. B., Hidayah, I., & Pujiastuti, E. (2024). The relation of complex problem solving with reflective abstraction: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 13(3), 2020. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i3.26358 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i3.26358
Veraldo Junior, L. G., Vilela, D. C., & Marques, A. S. (2024, May 13). STEM Project: Students in the teaching role for mathematical learning. V Seven International Multidisciplinary Congress. https://doi.org/10.56238/sevenVmulti2024-154 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56238/sevenVmulti2024-154
Vithanage, V., & Nakashima, N. (2025). Evaluating the effectiveness of a project-based stem curriculum in the acquisition and development of 4cs of 21st-century skills. School Science and Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.18388 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.18388
Wahdaniyah, N., Agustini, R., & Tukiran, T. (2023). Analysis of effectiveness pbl-stem to improve student’s critical thinking skills. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(3), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i3.312 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i3.312
Weinhandl, R., Lindenbauer, E., Schallert-Vallaster, S., Pirklbauer, J., & Hohenwarter, M. (2024). GeoGebra, a comprehensive tool for learning mathematics. In Designing Effective Digital Learning Environments (pp. 39–56). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003386131-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003386131-6
Westphale, S., Backhaus, J., & Koenig, S. (2022). Quantifying teaching quality in medical education: The impact of learning gain calculation. Medical Education, 56(3), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14694 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14694
Wu, B., Hu, Y., Yu, X., Sun, M., Xie, H., Li, Z., & Wang, M. (2023). How do secondary students engage in complex problem-solving processes in a STEM project? Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 15(4), 506–522. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2023.15.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2023.15.029
Yaghmour, K. S., & Obaidat, L. T. (2022). The Effectiveness of using direct instruction in teaching comprehension skill of third-grade students. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 373–392. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15221a DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15221a
Yohannes, A., & Chen, H.-L. (2023). GeoGebra in mathematics education: a systematic review of journal articles published from 2010 to 2020. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5682–5697. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2016861 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2016861
Yorganci, S. (2023). Preliminary undergraduate students’ understanding of mathematics in the distance education environment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(4), 1219–1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10292-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10292-4
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lillian Dhian Nafiatul Azhar, Megita Dwi Pamungkas, Dita Aldila Krisma (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
