Analysis Junior High School Students' Conceptual Understanding of Flat-Sided Space Structures Based on Bloom's Taxonomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38114/reimann.v7i2.108Keywords:
understanding concept, build room side flat, Bloom's Taxonomy, junior high school mathematicsAbstract
This study aims to analyze junior high school students' conceptual understanding in solving problems on three-dimensional with flat surfaces based on the revised Bloom's Taxonomy. This research employed a descriptive qualitative method with 6 seventh-grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Glagah , selected through purposive sampling. The research instruments consisted of essay tests and semi-structured interview guidelines referring to the six cognitive levels of Bloom's Taxonomy (C1–C6) and validated by experts. The data were analyzed through data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing, with methodological triangulation to ensure the validity of the findings. The results showed that 13% of students were in the high category, 73% in the medium category, and 13% in the low category. High-category students mastered all conceptual understanding indicators, while medium- and low-category students experienced difficulties at the analyzing (C4), evaluating (C5), and creating (C6) levels. These findings indicate the need for learning strategies that enhance higher-order thinking skills through contextual problem-solving, the use of visual media, and problem-based learning.
Downloads
References
Febriana, R., Yusri, R., & Delyana, H. (2020). Modul Geometri Ruang Berbasis Problem Based Learning Terhadap Kreativitas Pemecahan Masalah. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i1.2591 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i1.2591
Hanggara, Y., Aisyah, S. H., & Amelia, F. (2022). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa ditinjau dari perbedaan gender. Pythagoras: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.33373/pythagoras.v11i2.4490 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33373/pythagoras.v11i2.4490
Hartini, S. T., & Setyaningsih, R. (2023). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Geometri Bebasis Higher Order Skill (HOTS) Berdasarkan Teori Newman Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 932–944. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.2230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.2230
Khairul, F., Edi, A., & Akbar Aldiansyah. (2024). Jurnal seramoe education. Jurnal Seramoe Education, 1(2), 140–154. https://jurnal.serambimekkah.ac.id/index.php/jsedu/article/download/2606/2101/6483
Kristanto, H. Y. W., & Manoy, J. T. (2021). Representasi Matematis Siswa SMA dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Sistematis dan Intuitif. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 4(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.26740/jppms.v4n2.p50-59 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jppms.v4n2.p50-59
Mukarom, D. I., Sumarna, N., & Sahidin, L. (2023). Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep Dan Representasi Geometri Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Teori Van Hiele. Jurnal Wahana Kajian Pendidikan IPS, 7(1), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v7i01.1144
Murtiyasa, B., & Sari, N. K. P. M. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Pada Materi Bilangan Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(3), 2059. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i3.5737 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i3.5737
Priliawati, E., Slamet, I., & Sujadi, I. (2019). Analysis of junior high school students’ errors in solving HOTS geometry problems based on Newman’s error analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/3/032131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/3/032131
Putri, B. S., Zainil, M., Jl, A., Hamka, P., Barat, A. T., & Barat, S. (2025). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Geometri Menggunakan Model Problem Based Learning di Kelas V SDN 18 Tebing Tinggi Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan. 71(C).
Sari, M., Yusmin, E., & T, A. Y. (2021). Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa Pada Materi Segitiga. Jurnal AlphaEuclidEdu, 2(1), 122. https://doi.org/10.26418/ja.v2i1.48070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26418/ja.v2i1.48070
Wilson, L. O. (2016). Blooms Taxonomy Revised - Understanding the New Version of Bloom’s Taxonomy. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, 1(1), 1–8.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ahmad ubaidillah, Luluk Faridah, Khafidhoh Nurul Aini (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
