Metacognition Analysis in Problem Solving of Field Independent and Field Dependent Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38114/reimann.v6i3.48Keywords:
metacognition, problem-solving, field independent, field dependentAbstract
This study aims to describe students' metacognition in solving PtLSV problems regarding field-independent and field-dependent cognitive styles. This research was conducted at SMP Negeri 1 Muaro Jambi in the 2023/2024 academic year. This type of research is qualitative research. The subjects of this study were 4 students of class VIIA of SMP Negeri 1 Muaro Jambi, 2 students each with field-independent cognitive style and field-dependent cognitive style. Data collection methods were the results of the GEFT test to determine students with field-independent and field-dependent cognitive styles , PtLSV problem-solving questions, unstructured interviews and documentation. Data analysis techniques consisted of data collection, data reduction, data presentation and conclusion. The results showed that students with field-independent cognitive style met all indicators of metacognitive activity in problem-solving. However, students with field-dependent cognitive style did not meet the metacognitive evaluation indicators in re-checking the results, and errors were seen in operating PtLSV problem-solving. The second student with a field-dependent cognitive style, he only met the metacognitive activity indicators in understanding problems but did not yet have a strategy in solving PtLSV problem-solving questions.
Downloads
References
Aulia, L. I., & Murtiyasa, B. (2023). Analisis Profil Metakognisi Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Ditinjau dari Gender pada Pembelajaran Matematika. 07(June), 1545–1557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i2.2302
Ginting, S. D., & Nasution, H. A. (2024). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Field Independent dan Field Dependent. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 305–315. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v8i1.3063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v8i1.3063
Haavold, P. Ø., & Sriraman, B. (2022). Creativity in problem solving: integrating two different views of insight. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 54(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01304-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01304-8
Huda, N., & Marsal, J. (2021). Exploring Student Metacognitive Failures Based on Red Flag in Mathematic Problem Solving: A Case Study in Mathematic Education Program. Proceedings of the 3rd Green Development International Conference (GDIC 2020), 205(Gdic 2020), 452–460. https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.210825.077 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.210825.077
Kozhevnikov, M. (2007). Cognitive Styles in the Context of Modern Psychology: Toward an Integrated Framework of Cognitive Style. Psychological Bulletin, 133(3), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.3.464 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.3.464
Maf’ulah, S., & Juniati, D. (2020). The effect of learning with reversible problem-solving approach on prospective-math-teacher students’ reversible thinking. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13223a DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13223a
Magiera, M. T., & Zawojewski, J. S. (2011). Characterizations of social-based and self-based contexts associated with students’awareness, evaluation,and regulation of their thinking during small-group mathematical modeling. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(5), 486–520. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.42.5.0486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.42.5.0486
Ngawi, S. M. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa. 1, 43–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57008/jjm.v1i2.560
Polya, G. (1978). How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method second edition. In The Mathematical Gazette (Vol. 30, p. 181). http://www.jstor.org/stable/3609122?origin=crossref
Ramadani, Y., & Fajri, A. (2023). Analisis Berpikir Reflektif Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Field Dependent dan Field Independent. 07(1), 796–809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.990
Taufik, A. R., & Suryani, D. R. (2022). DARI GAYA KOGNITIF REFLEKTIF DAN IMPULSIF. 4, 40–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30598/jmsvol4issue1pp40-48
Udil, P. A. (2020). Proses Metakognisi dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Proses Metakognisi dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. June 2019.
Wijaya, A. P. (2020). Gaya Kognitif Field Dependent Dan Tingkat Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Antara Pembelajaran Langsung Dan STAD. Jurnal Derivat: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.31316/j.derivat.v3i2.713 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31316/j.derivat.v3i2.713
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1–64. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543047001001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543047001001
Wulan, E. R., & Anggraini, R. E. (2019). Gaya Kognitif Field-Dependent dan Field-Independent sebagai Jendela Profil Pemecahan Masalah Polya dari Siswa SMP. Journal Focus Action of Research Mathematic (Factor M), 1(2), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.30762/factor_m.v1i2.1503 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30762/factor_m.v1i2.1503
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Maria Ronauli Sihotang, Nizlel Huda, Novferma (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
