CHREMATA: Journal of Economics, Management, Finance, and Banking menerapkan proses penelaahan sejawat (peer review) secara double-blind, di mana identitas penulis dan reviewer dirahasiakan satu sama lain.
Setiap naskah ditelaah oleh minimal dua reviewer independen yang memiliki keahlian sesuai bidang kajian naskah. Keputusan akhir diterbitkan oleh Editor in Chief berdasarkan rekomendasi reviewer dan hasil evaluasi tim editorial.

Langkah-langkah proses review adalah sebagai berikut:

1. Pemeriksaan awal (initial screening): Editor memeriksa kesesuaian naskah dengan fokus dan ruang lingkup jurnal, serta memastikan kepatuhan terhadap pedoman etika dan format penulisan.
2. Penugasan reviewer: Naskah yang lolos pemeriksaan awal dikirim kepada dua reviewer untuk evaluasi ilmiah secara double-blind.
3. Penilaian reviewer: Reviewer menilai orisinalitas penelitian, ketepatan metodologi, kejelasan analisis, relevansi teori dan literatur, serta kontribusinya terhadap pengembangan ilmu ekonomi, manajemen, keuangan, dan perbankan.
4. Keputusan editorial: Berdasarkan rekomendasi reviewer, editor akan memutuskan apakah naskah:
   • diterima tanpa revisi,
   • diterima dengan revisi minor atau mayor, atau
   • ditolak untuk diterbitkan.
5. Revisi oleh penulis: Penulis diminta untuk mengirimkan versi revisi beserta tanggapan terhadap masukan reviewer.
6. Keputusan akhir: Editor in Chief mengeluarkan keputusan akhir setelah revisi disetujui dan dinyatakan layak terbit.

Rata-rata waktu penelaahan berlangsung antara 4–8 minggu, tergantung pada kompleksitas artikel dan ketersediaan reviewer.
Seluruh proses dilakukan dengan menjunjung tinggi objektivitas, kerahasiaan, dan integritas ilmiah.

All manuscripts submitted to CHREMATA: Journal of Economics, Management, Finance, and Banking undergo a double-blind peer review process, ensuring that both author and reviewer identities remain confidential.
Each submission is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise in the manuscript’s subject area. The final decision is made by the Editor in Chief based on the reviewers’ recommendations and the editorial team’s assessment.

The review process consists of the following stages:

1. Initial screening: The editor evaluates the manuscript’s relevance to the journal’s focus and scope, as well as its compliance with ethical standards and formatting guidelines.
2. Reviewer assignment: Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent to two qualified reviewers under a double-blind system.
3. Reviewer assessment: Reviewers evaluate the paper’s originality, research methodology, clarity of analysis, theoretical and literature relevance, and overall scholarly contribution to the fields of economics, management, finance, and banking.
4. Editorial decision: Based on reviewer feedback, the editor determines whether the manuscript is:
   • accepted without revision,
   • accepted with minor or major revisions, or
   • rejected.
5. Revision by authors: Authors are required to revise their manuscript and provide a detailed response to the reviewers’ comments.
6. Final decision: The Editor in Chief issues the final decision once the revised manuscript meets the publication standards.

The average review period takes 4–8 weeks, depending on the paper’s complexity and reviewer availability. The entire process upholds the principles of objectivity, confidentiality, and academic integrity.